[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

Celeste Anderson celestea at usc.edu
Wed Mar 27 18:44:39 EDT 2013



-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:03 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

On 3/27/13 1:16 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:20 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3
>> Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
>> Part 1 brings ARIN's allocation policies in line with the upcoming 
>> fee schedule so that it is possible to qualify as every level of ISP 
>> while holding IPv6 number resources.
> This looks like a billing policy problem. The technical (i.e. number
> policy) case for a smaller-than-/32 ISP allocation seems weak to me.
> IMO, this problem could (and should!) be solved by billing 
> organizations with both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses only for the IPv4 
> addresses until IPv6 is prevalent enough to support its own costs.
> ARIN's board is -supposed- to optimize billing policy for the sake of 
> technically sound number policy, not the other way around.

I agree that this is a billing problem, not a technical one. IPv6 /32 for every ISP and more if you can justify it was (and should continue to
be) the correct approach in my opinion.

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list