[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[John Curran]

On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:10 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:

> Yes, probably. I added the last sentence to make it abundantly clear, that is the intended effect of the first sentence.  If John and staff interpret the first sentence as requiring ARIN to reserve a /32 for anyone with a x-small or xx-small IPv6 allocation, then I would be happy to remove the last sentence.  But, if there is anyway to interpret the first sentence as not requiring the a hard reservation of a /32 then I think I'd prefer to leave the sentence in.

Unless otherwise directed by policy, IPv6 /36 allocations shall be from a reserved /32 and /40 would be from a reserved /36 (just as /32's come from /28 reserved blocks)

FYI,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN