[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
bill at herrin.us
Fri Mar 29 14:03:34 EDT 2013
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Brandon Ross <bross at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, David Farmer wrote:
>> 184.108.40.206(h): An LIR that received a /32 initial allocation before the
>> availability of the /36 and /40 initial allocation sizes is entitled to a
>> one-time decrease of their allocation size to /36 or /40. Such an LIR will
>> retain the first (lowest numbered) subnet or the last (highest numbered)
>> subnet of their original block.
> What benefit does it give the community to limit reduction in allocation
> size to only those that were issued earlier and only once? I am against
> that change as plenty of organizations may make initial errors in their
> allocation requests and might want to move back to a smaller size later.
Would this be acceptable then?
220.127.116.11(h): An LIR that received an initial allocation before the
availability of the /36 and /40 initial allocation sizes and holds
only that single IPv6 allocation is entitled to a one-time decrease of
their allocation size to /36 or /40. Such an LIR will retain the
first (lowest numbered) subnet or the last (highest numbered) subnet
of their original block.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML