[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
David Farmer
farmer at umn.edu
Wed Mar 27 22:06:28 EDT 2013
On 3/27/13 20:52 , Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> I included /56 because if I'd said /32 /48 /64 someone would have told
> me about /56 as a midway point between /64 and /48 for home users that
> need more than one subnet. I personally stick to the /32 /48 /64 system.
>
> ~Seth
I agree with you, but the questions is do we force everyone to use that
model? If you look at the costs of running even an ISP small enough to
run with a /22 of IPv4 $2000 a year really isn't that much. But, the
new fee schedule with both x-small and xx-small provides pretty good
equity in the fee structure on the lower end, that is really difficult
to make work with a one size fits all policy.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list