[arin-ppml] ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles / Request for General Thoughts
kkargel at polartel.com
Wed Jun 26 12:27:10 EDT 2013
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:14 AM
To: David Farmer
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles / Request for General Thoughts
Would you mind expanding on that a bit? If an IPv4 transfer market could be shown to exhibit better liquidity in the absence of any ARIN needs analysis (it hasn't, but for the sake of the argument assume someone offered a satisfactory proof that it would) would you come down on the side of better liquidity (addresses are available to be
acquired) or documented need like we've applied to the free pool this past decade (only those who deserve addresses get them)?
<Kevin> Isn't the liquidity of a transfer market in itself outside of ARIN's scope?
> I think there are even higher principle that we should be considering,
> such as.
> - All Internet users (or consumers) and devices connected to the
> Internet are entitled to unique internet number resource assigned to
> them from a network operator.
> - Network operators, public or private, are entitled to unique
> Internet number resource from the Internet Registry System to connect
> users (or
> consumers) and devices to the Internet.
Are these not matters of network infrastructure policy outside ARIN's scope?
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML