[arin-ppml] ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles / Request for General Thoughts

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 19:48:17 EDT 2013


1) needs-based
No.  Well, maybe.  This is not a question conducive to yes/no answers.
 Traditional needs assessments and methods are going to need to shift, this
question does not really frame or suggest any of the options for that
change.

2) routability
Yes.

3) Uniqueness
Yes, overriding goal

4) Balancing
Without a properly framed 1) it's hard to address how to balance, or what
balance function to apply.



On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> As the shepherd for ARIN-2013-4, I'd like to note that while the
> initial conversation on this draft policy was fairly constructive,
> more recent comments have gone a bit off topic. Rather than debating
> the history of internet governance it would be very helpful for the AC
> to understand the general sentiment of this community with regard to
> the draft policy more directly.
>
> With that in mind, I'd like to gather opinion and thoughts on several
> key questions. These questions should be answered in terms of how you
> believe ARIN should operate today and into the future in order to
> uphold its goal of stewardship of the Internet number resources in its
> care.
>
> 1) Do you support the principle of efficient utilization based on need
> (Conservation/Sustainability)?
>
> 2) Do you support the principle of hierarchical aggregation (Routability)?
>
> 3) Do you support the principle of uniqueness (Registration)?
>
> 4) Do you support the goal of balancing these principles with each
> other under the overarching principle of Stewardship?
>
> Please feel free to provide your thoughts on each of these items as
> general principles. Please state a definitive support or do not
> support for each individual principle/goal and provide a brief
> rational for that position. For now I'd like to ask that we evaluate
> the principles generally - and not to argue with each others opinions
> but simply to each state our own. Once we have a sense of the
> community support, we can then dig into specific text for each item
> based on the level of support and the rationale behind that level of
> support.
>
> This will be very helpful as we decide our next steps with this draft
> policy.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Chris
>
> --
> @ChrisGrundemann
> http://chrisgrundemann.com
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20130610/2e064945/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list