[arin-ppml] ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles / Request for General Thoughts

Chris Grundemann cgrundemann at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 13:03:21 EDT 2013


----
my android sent this

On Jun 10, 2013 12:18 PM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>
> For anyone keeping score:

Anyone keeping score probably doesn't need you to do it for them... ;-)

This also is likely a bit premature. I'd like to encourage more folks,  who
haven't responded yet, to provide their thoughts. I've avoided sending such
a summary for fear it would have a chilling effect, signaling that the
thread is closed. This is not the case.

~Chris

> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > 1) Do you support the principle of efficient utilization based on need
> > (Conservation/Sustainability)?
>
> 6 of 16 respondents in favor, 9 opposed, 1 did not offer an answer
> that could be interpreted as support or opposition.
>
> 14 of 16 respondents used language that could reasonably be
> interpreted as supporting sustainable allocation as a principle,
> independent of the "needs" question. 1 offered language opposed.
>
> 8 of 11 respondents could be reasonably understood to favor
> conservation as a principle. 3 were opposed.
>
>
>
> > 2) Do you support the principle of hierarchical aggregation
(Routability)?
>
> 5 of 16 respondents favor, 11 of 16 oppose heirarchy, aggregation or
> both as a principle but are not necessarily against its current
> practice.
>
> 14 of 16 used various language to express a view that supporting
> routing scalability is an appropriate principle. 2 offered the view
> that ARIN activity should not be informed by routing issues.
>
>
> > 3) Do you support the principle of uniqueness (Registration)?
>
> Unanimously favorable response.
>
>
> > 4) Do you support the goal of balancing these principles with each
> > other under the overarching principle of Stewardship?
>
> 7 of 16 support, 8 of 16 oppose, 1 non-answer. Most answers were
> nuanced such that the yeses were conditional on the respondent's
> unique interpretation of the word stewardship and the no's were along
> the lines of "define this better."
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
> --
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20130610/42cfb87b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list