[arin-ppml] Against 2013-4
mysidia at gmail.com
Wed Jun 5 20:11:48 EDT 2013
On 6/5/13, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> On 6/5/13 4:44 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote:
>> The needs based policies will need to be constantly tightened "to keep
>> from running out".
> Exactly why do you advocate that?
I think the implementation of policy shifts to stricter and stricter
review and requirements,
is already an established fact, not a proposal?
Something that happens anyways, but still doesn't stop exhaustion;
just a small delay.
Isn't continuously "tightening the needs based policies" what the
"IPV4 Countdown plan" is all about?
"PHASE FOUR (ONE /8 EQUIVALENT REMAINING)"
"All requests of any size will be subject to team review."
"The hold period for returned, reclaimed, and revoked blocks will be
reduced to one month."
I read this as "a higher standard of need" and "higher standard of
proof" will be required, as the pool shrinks; divided into 4
More information about the ARIN-PPML