[arin-ppml] Against 2013-4

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Tue Jun 4 18:34:43 EDT 2013

On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com<mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>> wrote:

John, you are right but when high level RFC changes are contemplated maybe polling all of the organizations listed in the ARIN database for comments is the proper thing to do.  After all Legacy Holder allocations were made under those RFCs et al.

Steven -

     Polling any subset of the community runs a very real risk of bias in the resulting input,
     and since affected parties are more than those who were issued resources, it is best
     if those with an interest in number resource policy make their view known.

     Note that many resource holders simply wish to use their IP number resources; i.e.
     they requested and received their resources and wish to be unmolested but simply
     use those resources in peace, and ARIN contacting all resource holders for each new
     draft policy would quickly rise to the level of being perceived as "spam"...


John Curran
President and CEO

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20130604/13b5dc26/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list