[arin-ppml] Against 2013-4
SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Tue Jun 4 18:18:56 EDT 2013
John, you are right but when high level RFC changes are contemplated maybe polling all of the organizations listed in the ARIN database for comments is the proper thing to do. After all Legacy Holder allocations were made under those RFCs et al.
From: John Curran [mailto:jcurran at arin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:53 PM
To: Steven Ryerse
Cc: Blake Dunlap; Kevin Kargel; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Against 2013-4
On Jun 4, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com<mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>> wrote:
Of course we could ask everyone in the ARIN community to comment.
And before anyone says that they could comment if they wish, I don't see anywhere in my Legacy paperwork that says I(they) have to participate in this community to be a stakeholder. This community needs to be open minded and not closed minded - and it needs to take into consideration all ARIN stakeholders and not just the ones that decide to comment.
The "ARIN community" is actually very, very large; it could be considered all
potentially affected parties, which transcends simply number resource holders
in this region, and by definition it is impossible to proactively poll all of them
for their views.
All welcome to participate, and we have done extensive outreach at conferences
(such Interop, CES, Usenix, Comdex, Gartner, etc.) and via hundreds of articles
and interviews in trade publications over the years.
While we are very open, there is indeed a threshold for having ones views heard,
and that is actual participation in the policy process. Each time draft policy is
published, that _is_ an invitation for all interested parties to comment; no party
or interest has a unique privilege of being polled for their views on a given draft
President and CEO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML