[arin-ppml] Against 2013-4
billdarte at gmail.com
Mon Jun 3 23:05:13 EDT 2013
I really can't quite get my head around the argument that when a resource
like IPv4 gets really scarce, the way to conserve them for the greatest
good it so provide a market that makes them only available to those who can
pay for them regardless of a need to use them for their intended purpose.
Sorry. I'm in support of 2013-4 but I continue to be convinced that
granting allocations and assignments to those who do not 'need' the
addresses to grow the Internet is a good idea for anyone other than those
in the middle.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> > "Operational need" is a just a tool that supports conservation for the
> > sake of sustainability. If a better tool proves itself, we shouldn't
> > hesitate to jettison operational need.
> What'd be helpful would be defining the criteria by which a
> replacement tool has to be measured when proving itself.
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML