[arin-ppml] Against 2013-4

[Jimmy Hess]

On 6/5/13, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> On 6/5/13 4:44 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote:
>> The needs based policies will need to be constantly tightened "to keep
>> from running out".
> Exactly why do you advocate that?

I think the implementation of policy shifts to stricter and stricter
review and requirements,
is already an established fact, not  a proposal?

Something that happens anyways,  but still doesn't stop exhaustion;
just a small delay.


Isn't  continuously "tightening the needs based policies"  what the
"IPV4 Countdown plan" is all about?

"PHASE FOUR (ONE /8 EQUIVALENT REMAINING)"
"All requests of any size will be subject to team review."
"The hold period for returned, reclaimed, and revoked blocks will be
reduced to one month."


I read this as   "a higher standard of need"  and  "higher standard of
proof"   will  be required, as the pool shrinks;  divided into 4
phases.



> ~Seth
--
-J