[arin-ppml] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Mon Apr 15 19:00:08 EDT 2013

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:38 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> If an IPv4 address market is going to work *at all* then it will work
>> for this situation. It looks like you drew the short straw and get to
>> be the guinea pig. Find someone with a /24 willing to sell and acquire
>> it under NRPM 8.3. And document the heck out of the process so that
>> your experience can guide the next policy changes around the IPv4
>> market concept.
> If he can't qualify for space from ARIN, how is he going to qualify to
> receive space via transfer?  The requirements are the same (with the
> exception of 3-month vs. 24-month need, which isn't the limiting factor
> here).  And the minimum allocation size for ISPs is /22 per NRPM
> only end-users can get /24's from ARIN (or via transfer), under NRPM

Hi John,

Can you comment on this? Are ISPs able to receive /24 and /23 blocks
via NRPM 8.3 transfers?

Bill Herrin

William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list