[arin-ppml] Fee Philosophy

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Sun Apr 7 16:31:03 EDT 2013

On 4/7/2013 4:46 AM, John Curran wrote:
> No NRPM change is needed because of the Revised Fee schedule; fees 
> under the new schedule will be lower for smallest ISPs in any case. 
> The question is whether the community also provide support for a 
> xx-small category which is even lower ($500/year) but distinguished by 
> only a /40 IPv6 allocation. This is being discussed in Draft Policy 
> ARIN-2013-3, and while it is enabled by the Revised Fee schedule, it 
> is an independent item for the community to consider and can be 
> adopted or not based on its merits. 

And what happens when next week ARIN's board comes up with the 
xxxx-small category at $200/year, distinguished by a /60 IPv6 
allocation. Are we supposed to create more bad numbering policy then too?

Matthew Kaufman

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list