[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
ikiris at gmail.com
Fri Apr 5 16:20:53 EDT 2013
I also opposed minimums for ISPs below /32 based on an issue of business
model for ARIN. Fix the billing problem, or the board membership problem,
don't try to make this a technical solution to a business problem.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
<gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:27 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> > The obvious solutions within the fee structure are:
> > 1. The non-profit discount
> > 2. No-fee IPv6 for IPv4 holders until IPv6 becomes dominant
> > #2 solves the short-term problem of folks who won't spend money on a
> > protocol that won't yet make them money while #1 addresses the
> > community network need.
> NRPM section 6.5.9 already (to some extent) addresses the
> community network need, which allows community networks
> to request a /48 (/44 with justification).
> I have previous pointed to the boards decision to not provide
> a non-profit discount schedule, and while I can understand
> their reasoning, I also think in reality to get 501(c) qualified
> it can easily take $1000/yr (opportunity costs, if not out
> of pocket), so it is not really a solution for many to achieve
> a substantive savings in ARIN fees. [And 501(c) (or country
> equivalent) should be the requirement, not yet another
> definition by ARIN of what a non-profit might be.]
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML