[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
bross at pobox.com
Fri Apr 5 12:46:26 EDT 2013
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> I see no reason to have a policy motivated strictly by fees to remain after
> fee changes that may or may not negate it, and to determine that it should go
> back through the PDP. Otherwise we're just cluttering the NRPM with
> irrelevant policy.
But the problem is that you don't know how the fee schedule might change
in the future, and it would be nearly impossible to capture every possible
permutation and create a rational outcome.
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross
More information about the ARIN-PPML