[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

David Farmer farmer at umn.edu
Fri Apr 5 12:31:53 EDT 2013

On 4/5/13 11:24 , Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 4/4/13 3:53 PM, David Farmer wrote:
>> If the lower ones go a way then, as was said no one in their right mind
>> would choose /36 or /40.  I can't imagine anything smaller, I just don't
>> see room for more changes one the smaller side.  At least without
>> changing the IPv6 architecture and the /64 subnet standard, and that
>> would be a big enough change that a whole bunch of assumptions need to
>> change not just this one.
> I would want to see verbiage in the policy that would immediately
> revoke/revert it if any fee schedule changes are made. If we're going to
> start making policy based on the fees then we should have to rerun them
> through the them the PDP anytime the fees they are based on change.

I'm not going to include that right now but I will raise that question 
at the Barbados meeting.

David Farmer               Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list