[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
farmer at umn.edu
Fri Apr 5 11:25:21 EDT 2013
On 4/5/13 10:07 , William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:45 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>> On 4/5/13 08:31 , William Herrin wrote:
>>> This could be misread to mean "/32 or /36 respectively" instead of
>>> "either /32 or /36 as the registrant chooses."
>> That's was bugging me too, but I wasn't sure how to fix it. How about;
>> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
>> expand the allocation to either /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering
>> or additional justification. ...
>> Does that cover it without getting to wordy?
> Hi David,
> I'm not sure if "either" makes a difference. Maybe "expand the
> allocation to a choice of /36 or /32.: Might also help to reverse the
> order of /32 and /36 so that "respectively" doesn't fit right.
> Or redo the whole sentence as something like, "A LIR that requests a
> smaller than /32 allocation is entitled to expand the allocation to a
> choice of /36 or /32 at any time [...]"
g. An LIR that requests smaller than /32 allocation is entitled to
expand the allocation to a choice of /36 or /32 at any time without
renumbering or additional justification. ...
>> e. All block(s) returned must not be in use by the organization or its
>> Not a big change but it read a little better.
> It's the "All  must not" construction that seems clumsy to me.
> Normally it's "all must" or "no may."
e. All block(s) returned are not in use by the organization or its
Which should be read as;
ARIN will accept the return of whole or partial block(s) allowing an
organization to reduce their holdings as long as: e. All block(s)
returned are not in use by the organization or its customers.
David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
More information about the ARIN-PPML