[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
farmer at umn.edu
Fri Apr 5 09:45:28 EDT 2013
On 4/5/13 08:31 , William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
>> expand the allocation to /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or
>> additional justification.
> Hi David,
> This could be misread to mean "/32 or /36 respectively" instead of
> "either /32 or /36 as the registrant chooses."
That's was bugging me too, but I wasn't sure how to fix it. How about;
g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
expand the allocation to either /32 or /36 at any time without
renumbering or additional justification. ...
Does that cover it without getting to wordy?
>> e. All returned block(s) must not be in use by the organization or its
> This verbiage is a little clumsy. I'm not sure how to word it better.
e. All block(s) returned must not be in use by the organization or its
Not a big change but it read a little better.
David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
More information about the ARIN-PPML