[arin-ppml] Fee Philosophy
matthew at matthew.at
Sun Apr 7 16:31:03 EDT 2013
On 4/7/2013 4:46 AM, John Curran wrote:
> No NRPM change is needed because of the Revised Fee schedule; fees
> under the new schedule will be lower for smallest ISPs in any case.
> The question is whether the community also provide support for a
> xx-small category which is even lower ($500/year) but distinguished by
> only a /40 IPv6 allocation. This is being discussed in Draft Policy
> ARIN-2013-3, and while it is enabled by the Revised Fee schedule, it
> is an independent item for the community to consider and can be
> adopted or not based on its merits.
And what happens when next week ARIN's board comes up with the
xxxx-small category at $200/year, distinguished by a /60 IPv6
allocation. Are we supposed to create more bad numbering policy then too?
More information about the ARIN-PPML