[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
sethm at rollernet.us
Fri Apr 5 12:24:50 EDT 2013
On 4/4/13 3:53 PM, David Farmer wrote:
> If the lower ones go a way then, as was said no one in their right mind
> would choose /36 or /40. I can't imagine anything smaller, I just don't
> see room for more changes one the smaller side. At least without
> changing the IPv6 architecture and the /64 subnet standard, and that
> would be a big enough change that a whole bunch of assumptions need to
> change not just this one.
I would want to see verbiage in the policy that would immediately
revoke/revert it if any fee schedule changes are made. If we're going to
start making policy based on the fees then we should have to rerun them
through the them the PDP anytime the fees they are based on change.
More information about the ARIN-PPML