[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size
christopher.morrow at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 12:48:13 EDT 2012
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Alexander, Daniel
<Daniel_Alexander at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> If we cannot explain why something requires special consideration, how are
> we going to quantify it?
I had been thinking of CI things as items which all of the rest of the
network depends upon. Examples from this thread are: tld nameservers,
I think today we can see that 'root/tld nameservers' are things that a
large portion of the network depends on being able to reach/use.
John's point about lisp/rpki bits also needing reachability may also
be true, though to be fair those services are still a bit off (well,
for wide-spread/dependent deployment) in the future.
Stepping back though, do we believe that there's a need for long term
use of stable v4 addresses for services that a large portion of the
network would be dependent upon?
More information about the ARIN-PPML