[arin-ppml] Utilization policy is not aggregate

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 09:44:35 EST 2012


On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:01 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Scott Leibrand
> <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Not necessarily opposed, but one reason for the existing
> > language is: if you are at 90% of a /16, and your 3 month
> > need is only for a /20, then you would still be at >80%
> > immediately after getting your /20, without using a bit of it.
> > If you have to use 80% (or even 50%) of all allocations,
> > that eliminates that loophole.
>
> Do you have to use 80% on all allocations? Or just the most recent one?
>

That's not very clear in the ISP additional allocation policy.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four24 for ISPs says:

4.2.4.1. Utilization percentage (80%)

ISPs must have efficiently utilized all previous allocations and at least
80% of their most recent allocation in order to receive additional space.
This includes all space reassigned to their customers. Please note that
until your prior utilization is verified to meet the 80% requirement, ARIN
can neither process nor approve a request for additional addresses.

https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four361 for end users is more clear:

4.3.6.1 Utilization Requirements for Additional Assignment

In order to justify an additional assignment, end-users must have
efficiently utilized at least 80% of all previous assignments, and must
provide ARIN with utilization details.

On the other hand, the Multiple Discrete Networks policy at
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four5 only requires 50% overall (but
80% of each site at the time it was assigned).

-Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20121116/c1640998/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list