[arin-ppml] Utilization policy is not aggregate
rgrant at skywaywest.com
Fri Nov 16 01:53:12 EST 2012
We're very near exhaustion so any new policy should be framed with the
transfer market in mind.
If somebody's willing to sell, and somebody else is willing to buy, but
they can't justify it because of a math problem - well, I'd be in favour
of changing it.
So the example is really this:
"if you are at 90% of a /16, and all that's available for purchase is a
/20, is it really a problem if after purchase you'd be able to buy more?"
On 12-11-15 9:53 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Matthew Wilder
>> <Matthew.Wilder at telus.com> wrote:
>> Are there any other opinions on this matter? I would like to hear any
>> opposition that may exist before moving forward with drafting a policy
> Not necessarily opposed, but one reason for the existing language is: if you are at 90% of a /16, and your 3 month need is only for a /20, then you would still be at >80% immediately after getting your /20, without using a bit of it. If you have to use 80% (or even 50%) of all allocations, that eliminates that loophole.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
Forgot to CC: List. Sorry for the duplicate, Scott.
Ron Grant Managed DSL/T1/Wireless/Fibre
Skyway West Business Internet Internet and Private Networking
rgrant at skywaywest.com Bonding and Fail Over Solutions
ph: 604 737 2113 Virtual Data Centre and Private Clouds
fax: 604 482 1299 http://www.skywaywest.com
Sales, Support and Billing http://www.skywaywest.com/contact-us.htm
More information about the ARIN-PPML