[arin-ppml] Utilization policy is not aggregate

[William Herrin]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Scott Leibrand
<scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not necessarily opposed, but one reason for the existing
> language is: if you are at 90% of a /16, and your 3 month
> need is only for a /20, then you would still be at >80%
> immediately after getting your /20, without using a bit of it.
> If you have to use 80% (or even 50%) of all allocations,
> that eliminates that loophole.

Do you have to use 80% on all allocations? Or just the most recent one?

-Bill

-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004