[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement
jcurran at arin.net
Fri May 4 14:02:25 EDT 2012
On May 4, 2012, at 1:39 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On 5/4/12, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> will note
>> that there are also statistical approaches that are allowed based on
>> the removal of individually identifying information.
> There you go. Statistical approaches based on the removal of
> individually identifying information. ARIN can't do this anywhere else
> it encounters /32 users because??
We ask for the customer assignment information necessary to
verify the utilization. This is relatively straightforward
and seems to work well for requesters. If you have very unusual
constraints, you are welcome to propose an alternative for ARIN
to verify this information for consideration, but please recognize
that you are very likely to be told that your proposed alternative
is insufficient for verification and we cannot consider those
assignments for purposes of calculating utilization.
If you would like ARIN to consider customer assignments as
utilized without further verification, or consider proof of
infrastructure to be sufficient validation for an assertion
of IP utilization typical for such equipment, then please
propose such as a change to number resource policy.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML