[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Fri May 4 08:19:13 EDT 2012

On May 4, 2012, at 8:12 AM, William Herrin wrote:

> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> Staff review is underway now.  At first glance, it appears that the proposal
>> is not a policy change for management of number resources but a suggestion
>> for a specific portion of the request verification process.
> Something's wrong here John. If we can't write a policy that says,
> "Err on the side of avoiding PII" and expect it to actually do
> something then the policy process is gravely broken.

Bill - 

   In lieu of asking for customer reassignments data to support claimed
   utilization of an address block, what information do you propose that 
   ARIN accept? 


John Curran
President and CEO

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list