[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-167 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers

Frank Bulk frnkblk at iname.com
Wed May 2 22:11:09 EDT 2012

I second Bill's thoughts here -- let them keep the first /24 and avoid the
re-numbering pain, but if they really have a justification for a /22 or
shorter, will there really be that many /24's from that situation that
pollute the RIB?  

The first /24 is likely more painful to renumber than any subsequent
netblock received.


-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 9:22 PM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-167 Removal of Renumbering Requirement
for Small Multihomers


I could probably be talked into the idea that an org may only hold a
single assignment smaller than /22 but is not required to renumber out
of that assignment when requesting a /22 or larger. In other words,
you can't just request another /24 and grow by costly little nibbles
at the RIB.

Bill Herrin

William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list