[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-167 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Thu May 3 03:12:47 EDT 2012
>
> Not really true since this renumbering can be done as old equipment dies
> and is cycled out of service.
>
Not likely in the time frame permitted by the policy being debated.
> Your correct this is an imaginary problem if everyone followed the
> standards. Unfortunately not everyone does. It is a real problem.
> But, it is only a real problem to people who aren't following the rules,
> and I don't cotton on to the idea of helping those kinds of people
> make their lives easier.
>
While I agree with you philosophically, the reality is that there is a difference
when those people are "customers" vs. when they are not.
When they are "customers" you tend to have to make all kinds of accommodations
for whatever they _WANT_ to do regardless of how it fits into your idea of what
is right. Especially when you are a business small enough to be affected by
this policy.
OWen
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list