[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2012-4: Return to 12 Month Supply and Reset Trigger to /8 in Free Pool
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net
Wed Mar 14 23:55:19 EDT 2012
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> I am opposed to this proposed policy.
>> The policy scope applies only to IPv4 resources. For those, it is not a question of how long we want resources to be available, but, how we distribute the pain of runout.
> There you go. I'll take the pin prick every week for the next 5
> years over decapitation in 12 months any day. Both questions
> amount to the same; "how long we want there to be resources available
> for assignment" is equivalent to "how long until runout".
> The idea that the amount of pain will necessarily be the same no
> matter how it is distributed, is just wrong. The duration of
> exhaustion cannot be considered independent of other factors related
> to the amount of "pain", such as more time and opportunity to
> conserve and promote more efficient use of IPv4 addressing, and more
> time available for IPv6 technologies to mature and be implemented.
> Increasing the time until runout by avoiding allocating resources too
> far in advance
> reduces the net amount of pain.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
Opposed. Here is my logic:
- At face value, being able to request 12 months is a plus, however..
- .. it's at the risk of killing off the surplus we've built up too quickly
- The STLS is now at 24 months, so keeping the free pool at 3 months
- I like recycling.
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
More information about the ARIN-PPML