[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-172 Additional definition for NRPM Section 2 - Legacy Resources

[Avri Doria]

As one of those legacy holders, I do not see what authority ARIN has with regards to those resources at all.  I recognize neither your authority to force me to sign an agreement, not to expropriate those addresses assigned to me by those who came before you. And whether I am using them at a moment in time or not, does not seem relevant.

If I trusted ARIN and found its services of value, I would sign. But neither of those is the case, hence, I haven't.

avri


Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:

>On 6/18/12, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>> This seems to be requiring all legacy holders to sign an RSA, I'm
>
>Well, the legacy holders who have not yet signed a RSA are in an
>"abnormal" situation.
>They might choose not to, but the policy ought to say that they should.
>
>After the 31 December expiration date of the LRSA offer,  the policy
>should say must have a signed RSA.
>
>> concerned about that level of a change.  And that there is an
>> implication that this should happen within 3 month.
>
>I am not suggesting anyone be forced to sign a RSA in any specific time
>frame,
>for resources that are being utilized  by the organization that the
>legacy
>registry assigned resources to.
>
>However, there should be an option available for demonstrably abandoned
>resources to be reclaimed by ARIN.
>
>> ===============================================
>> David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
>--
>-JH
>_______________________________________________
>PPML
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.