[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-171 Section 8.4 Modifications: ASN and legacy resources

[Cameron Byrne]

On Jun 14, 2012 10:13 AM, "Michael Sinatra" <michael+ppml at burnttofu.net>
wrote:
>
> On 6/14/12 9:54 AM, John Curran wrote:
> > Michael -
> >
> >   Can you include briefly why you are opposed and in particular
> >   if there are changes to either than might change your view?
> >
> >   (This helps proposal originators have a better understanding
> >   of the merits and concerns with their proposed changes...)
>
> Hi John:
>
> To be honest, reading through this thread has been painful, so let me be
> brief (at least by my standards):
>
> I do not believe that legacy resources should be treated differently
> from the perspective of registry policy.  Note that during the time I
> have been participating in ARIN, I have represented two different legacy
> holders, one who has signed at LRSA (along with RSA) and the other who
> hasn't signed an LRSA (but who also has RSA-covered resources).
>
> I do not agree with the rationale of this policy; specifically that
> legacy resources are inhibiting the adoption of IPv6.  Some of the
> biggest and earliest adopters of IPv6 are legacy holders, particularly
> USG and US EDU organizations.
>
> Much of what has transpired in this thread has basically made me want to
> affirm my opposition to 171 and 172, so I don't think there's much that
> will change my mind.
>
> thanks,
> michael
>

+1

I fully agree with Michael.

Cameron
_______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120614/f28e0380/attachment.htm>