[arin-ppml] Petition for advancement of Policy Proposal #168
jmaimon at chl.com
Thu Jul 26 01:34:23 EDT 2012
Chris Grundemann wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> Perhaps if you more fully explain how this policy change would deal
> with the lack of uptale of 4byte ASN (how specifically it differs from
> current ARIN practice and how those changes "Promote 4byte ASN Usage")
> more folks would be more in favor of it (and of your petition). I
> personally have not been able to parse that myself and so it may be
> possible that others are in the same boat. Just a thought.
> mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
The proposal gives requesters flexibility in obtaining as numbers.
This translates into preserving 16bit access for those who need or want it.
It also translates into increasing attractiveness for 32bit for those
who may have an affinity or preference for a specific one and under this
proposal, can get it.
Further, the proposal gives ARIN eyes, ears and a voice into the inner
workings of why people want the numbers they do and dont want the
numbers they dont.
This is something ARIN does not have now.
More information about the ARIN-PPML