[arin-ppml] Prop-151: Limiting needs requirements for IPv4 transfers

[Chris Grundemann]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 16:22, Alexander, Daniel
<Daniel_Alexander at cable.comcast.com> wrote:

> Not including "assignments" in section 8.3 was an oversight on my part. It
> should be "allocations and assignments". I would, however hesitate on
> including the word transfers in this restriction. The 12 month exclusion
> is intended to prevent people from obtaining IPv4 resources from the free
> pool and profiting from the transfer market. Do people think an
> organization should be precluded from obtaining resources on the transfer
> market if they exceed their original expectations and need more IP
> resources?

To clarify, this is a restriction on the source of transfers, not the
recipient. A transfer recipient who ends up needing more space within
the initial 12 months is still free to obtain said space. What would
not be allowed, under my proposed text, is for an entity to obtain
space via transfer and then turn around and transfer space off
immediately.

~Chris

> Thanks,
> Dan Alexander

> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org