[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification
springer at inlandnet.com
Fri Feb 17 17:49:34 EST 2012
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, McTim wrote:
> On Friday, February 17, 2012, Daved Daly wrote:
>>> Is it in the best interest of the community to maintain needs-based
>>> justification policy that may discourage legitimate participation
>>> through Specified Transfers in an attempt to corral the fringe element
>>> that would seek to speculate, horde and profit from IPv4 transfers?
>> I don't want to speak for them, but It seems like the obvious answer much
>> of the community is responding with is a clear, "yes".
> according to MM, we are just a *small number of anti-market ideologues*.
> In any case, there are better reasons to maintain needs requirements
> besides *corralling the fringe element*, but that alone is reason enough
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
John "Head in the Sand" Springer
More information about the ARIN-PPML