[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-163 Dedicated resources for initial ISP allocations

Joe Maimon jmaimon at chl.com
Wed Feb 8 23:35:59 EST 2012

David Farmer wrote:
> On 2/8/12 21:02 CST, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> Why is it important that it be discussed prior to deprecating the three
>> month rule?
> I prefer "redefining the soft landing trigger" or "resetting the
> trigger" to "deprecate the three month rule", because as proposed the
> three month rule wouldn't be deprecated, but the trigger reset for a new
> three-month rule to kick in when the free pool is down to /8.
> However, if we do that before discussing this issue it is possible that
> the free pool could be depleted down below /8 before this policy could
> be reasonably implemented. If we at least start the discussion at the
> same PPM as we start the discussion of resetting the trigger then I'm
> confident we could implement it if desired before we get down to a /8
> I'm not saying we have to do this for me to support resetting the
> trigger. However, I feel resetting the trigger before at least starting
> a serious discussion of this is a little disingenuous. At least that is
> my opinion.


I appreciate your support and I agree with you. Proposals to modify the 
three month window have direct relevance to the import and impact of 
this proposal.

You still wont see me supporting three month window reversions.



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list