[arin-ppml] 2011-7 Status FAIL

[Owen DeLong]

That might actually be a good idea. I would support modifying the policy to require that DNS actions prior to revocation result in a wildcard PTR that returns (a more polite) phrasing to that effect.

Owen

On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Larry Ash wrote:

> +1. 
> Much better.
> 
> Larry Ash
> Mountain West Telephone
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Jeff Wheeler <jsw at inconcepts.biz> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So I'm fine with "If an organization fails to respond within thirty (30)
>>> days, ARIN may cease providing reverse DNS services to that organization."
>> 
>> If I were supreme dictator of the Internet, I would simply return PTR
>> records like "THIS-IP-ADDRESS-SPACE-IS-STALE-OR-HIJACKED-VISIT-WWW.ARIN.NET"
>> 
>> Simply making reverse DNS fail may not attract the attention of
>> organizations that simply haven't done a good job of updating their
>> resource records.
>> 
>> $0.02.
>> -- 
>> Jeff S Wheeler <jsw at inconcepts.biz>
>> Sr Network Operator  /  Innovative Network Concepts
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.