[arin-ppml] 2011-7 Status FAIL
hannigan at gmail.com
Tue Feb 28 11:12:45 EST 2012
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Chris Grundemann
<cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:24, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The minutes demonstrate that an "overwhelming" majority at the PPM in
>> Philadelphia objected to at least the DNS requirement yet again.
> From the link that you included:
> "In relation to the second motion, whether the AC should be asked to
> continue to work on it, the total number of people in the meeting room
> and by remote are 167. In favor of asking them to do further work on
> it were 57 and against them doing further work on it is 6."
> To be clear, that's 57 to 6 in favor of further work on 2011-7. I'm
> really not sure how you can misinterpret that.
Let's put this back into context:
The minutes demonstrate that an "overwhelming" majority at the PPM in
Philadelphia objected to at least the DNS requirement yet again.
More information about the ARIN-PPML