[arin-ppml] 2011-7 Status FAIL

[Martin Hannigan]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Chris Grundemann
<cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:24, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The minutes demonstrate that an "overwhelming" majority at the PPM in
>> Philadelphia objected to at least the DNS requirement yet again.
>>
>> https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_XXVIII/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_7
>
> From the link that you included:
>
> "In relation to the second motion, whether the AC should be asked to
> continue to work on it, the total number of people in the meeting room
> and by remote are 167.  In favor of asking them to do further work on
> it were 57 and against them doing further work on it is 6."
>
> To be clear, that's 57 to 6 in favor of further work on 2011-7. I'm
> really not sure how you can misinterpret that.
>


Let's put this back into context:

The minutes demonstrate that an "overwhelming" majority at the PPM in
Philadelphia objected to at least the DNS requirement yet again.
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Best,

-M<