[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification on8.3 Specified Transfers

[Mike Burns]

I support this proposal and think it should be made known to this list that 
there is a currently a seller looking to sell a legacy /8.

http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2012/2/14/4998075.html

I believe this group must come together to recognize the disconnect between 
ARIN policy and the law when it comes to legacy addresses.
I have asked before and ask again, what is to happen to ARIN Whois authority 
when a well-bankrolled entity legally sells/buys legacy addresses with no 
regard to ARIN policy?

It's time to inculcate a free transfer market by removing ARIN transactional 
impediments like needs requirements, when those requirements were designed 
solely to foster conservative stewardship of free pool addresses, not 
already allocated addresses, on a transfer market where the addresses have a 
monetary value.

Fear of bogeymen like speculators and market-cornerers may be mitigated by 
the knowledge that huge blocks are available, and huge dollar amounts would 
be required to corner this market.

Speculators. Let's wait until we at least have a whiff of their existence 
before we strangle a market still in it's cradle

Good work Jeff.

Regards,
Mike Burns




-----Original Message----- 
From: ARIN
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:54 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification on8.3 
Specified Transfers

ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification on 8.3 Specified Transfers

ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
Development Process.

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be extended
to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.

The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.

Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Mailing list subscription information can be found
at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification on 8.3 Specified Transfers

Proposal Originator: Jeff Mehlenbacher

Proposal Version: 1

Date: 16 February 16 2012

Proposal type: Modify

Policy term: Permanent

Policy statement:

Current Policy Statement:
8.3. Transfers to Specified Recipients
In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 number resources within
the ARIN region may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource
holder, in whole or in part, for transfer to another specified
organizational recipient. Such transferred number resources may only be
received under RSA by organizations that are within the ARIN region and
can demonstrate the need for such resources in the amount which they can
justify under current ARIN policies showing how the addresses will be
utilized within 24 months.

Proposed Policy Statement
8.3. Transfers to Specified Recipients
In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 number resources within
the ARIN region may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource
holder, in whole or in part, for transfer to another specified
organizational recipient. Such transferred number resources may only be
received under RSA by organizations that are within the ARIN region and
requires that an Officer Attestation be provided confirming the
transferred number resources will be applied to enable current or
planned business models.

Rationale:

Current policy acts as a major impediment to freeing up unused IPv4
address and constrains trade in a free market economy. If a Company
receives Board approval to spend between $11.25 and $12.00 per IP, this
should suggest the business case is justified for the acquiring
organization. The role of ARIN should be to encourage the freeing of
IPv4 addresses that will otherwise remain dormant in the hands of
companies who have no incentive to transfer them.

The objective of the Specified Transfer market should be to a) encourage
source Companies to transfer their unused blocks thereby increasing
supply of IPv4 address and b) encourage recipient Companies to acquire
sufficient IPv4 addresses to support business plans rather than
depleting the free pool.

Current policy of demonstrating need for specified transfers, be it
based on 12 months or now 24 months, does not provide sufficient
incentive for organizations to acquire unused IPv4 addresses in a
financial transaction. Companies recognize they must still endure the
rigors of the justification process regardless of free allocation or
specified transfer…making it very difficult to justify a financial
transaction when specified transfers will still be assessed by exactly
the same techniques and algorithms applied for approval of free resources.

Eliminating needs-based justification has many benefits so long as all
transactions continue to flow through ARIN for ratification:

a) Buyer executive attestation will ensure the IP’s are being used for
business purposes. Failure to be truthful could result in punitive
measures against corporate officers, and is a risk an officer would not
be likely to take

b) Source Companies have an active market and financial incentive to
transfer unused IPv4 blocks to Companies with need

c) IPv4 number resources will not be scarce if adequate incentive exists
for Buyers to acquire unused blocks through specified transfer

d) Many Buyers express hesitation that confidential business plans must
be disclosed through the justification process—no such disclosure would
be required (under NDA or otherwise)

e) Legacy blocks will come under RSA in ever increasing numbers

f) Improves the accuracy, utility and value of the ARIN address registry

g) Effectively kills the black or gray IPv4 transfer market guaranteeing
ARIN’s custodianship over number resources

h) Encourages source Companies to free up resources and recipient
Companies to actively acquire available IPv4 blocks thereby eliminating
speculation because supply is abundant. Only when a resource is truly
scarce does capricious consumption (stockpiling) occur

i) The Free resource pool is best applied to small or new ISPs while
medium to large corporations with greater financial wherewithal are
encouraged to participate in specified transfers to acquire larger IPv4
blocks

Timetable for implementation: Immediate
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.