[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-162
David Farmer
farmer at umn.edu
Fri Feb 10 20:22:49 EST 2012
As AC shepherd for both ARIN-prop-161 and ARIN-prop-162, and looking at
the communities comments for both proposals, I see the following issues
that needed to be addressed in a revision of the text;
> CJ Aronson - "this says you're changing from "request up to a 3-month supply of IP addresses." to "request up to three month supply of IP addresses." It doesn't seem to change the policy at all. What am I missing here?"
To help clarify I am including the entire policy text not just the
paragraph that is changing, and proposing a new title that I hope better
expresses the intent of the policy.
> Owen DeLong - "I would rather see this simply state when the ARIN free pool has less than one /8 of space remaining, notwithstanding reservations under NRPM 4.4 and 4.10 rather than the convoluted retroactive phrasing in the current proposal text."
I believe the new text and rationale covers this;
> Joe Maimon - "b) What happens if the pool grows back to over /8? "
I tired to address this issue in the last sentence, and I believe the
intent is to stay at 3-months once triggered, even if we go back above
/8. Also, see in the rationale for a discussion of the exact amount
available in the free pool after the triggering request is fulfilled.
Feed back and/or suggestions please;
-------------------
Title: Return to 12 Month Supply and Reset Trigger to /8 in Free Pool
Policy statement:
4.2.4.4. Subscriber Members After One Year
After an organization has been a subscriber member of ARIN for one year,
they may choose to request up to a twelve (12) month supply of IP addresses.
When the ARIN Free Pool is down to the equilivant of one /8, excluding
all special reservations, the length of supply that an organization may
request will be reduced. An organization may choose to request up to a
three (3) month supply of IP addresses. Any request that reduces the
ARIN free pool below the /8 threshold above will trigger the reduction
for that and all subsequent requests by all organizations.
Rationale:
There has been discussion in the community that ARIN's inventory of IPv4
addresses may be excessive given the reduction in the rate of
consumption which is concurrent with the reduction to a 3 month supply
when ARIN received it last /8 at IANA run-out. And that such an excess
inventory in the ARIN region may be damaging the transition to IPv6 by
elongating the amount of time between ARIN's exhaustion and exhaustion
by other RIR's, thus creating a dangerous skew across parts of Internet
in the need to transition to IPv6. One solution for this issue is
increase ARIN's rate of consumption by restoring the a 12 month supply
of addresses.
ARIN's stewardship responsibilities are of primary concern in this
region. However, restoring the a 12 month supply of addresses is
consistent with these stewardship responsibilities. Asking businesses
to request addresses on a three month basis with such large inventory
available at ARIN unnecessarily increases the cost and complexity of
operating networks; repeated and slow interactions with ARIN, duplicate
paperwork requirements and an inefficient use of resources by all
compound the pain.
The original intent of ARIN-2009-8 "Equitable IPv4 Run-Out" wasn't
necessarily to slow the consumption of IPv4 but to limit the competitive
disadvantage created by unequal run-out. However, when the trigger of
IANA run-out was selected it wasn't anticipated that ARIN would have
more that 5 /8s in inventory when IANA run-out occurred. Therefore,
restoring the 12-month supply and resetting the trigger for a reduction
to a 3-month supply to a locally controlled event seems consistent with
the original intent of ARIN-2010-8 as well.
Considering that the ARIN region has consumed significantly less than a
/8 since the 3-month supply was triggered at IANA run-out a year ago;
Resetting the trigger for the 3-month supply to /8 in the free pool,
excluding all special reservations, seems reasonable. The special
reservations to be excluded, should include all reservations made in
policy, including those in sections 4.4, 4.10, any new reservations made
by subsequent policies, and may also include reservations for draft
policies in process at the board's discretion, such as Draft Policy
ARIN-2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension.
Please Note: By triggering on any request that would drop the free pool
below /8 it is possible that when there will be slightly more or
slightly less than /8 available after the triggering request is
fulfilled. The size of the triggering request and the exact amount above
/8 available in the free pool will determine how much more or less than
/8 will be available after the triggering request is fulfilled. This
could be as much as 3/4 of the triggering request above /8 or as much as
1/4 of the triggering request below /8 available after fulfilling the
triggering request.
To help clarify how this policy proposal changes Section 4.2.4.4, the
current policy text as of Feb 10, 2012 is included below;
4.2.4.4. Subscriber Members After One Year
After an organization has been a subscriber member of ARIN for one year,
they may choose to request up to a 12-month supply of IP addresses.
When ARIN receives its last /8, by IANA implementing section 10.4.2.2,
the length of supply that an organization may request will be reduced.
An organization may choose to request up to a 3-month supply of IP
addresses.
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list