[arin-ppml] Nanog IPV4 Panel Discussion and 8.3 transfers
jmaimon at chl.com
Fri Feb 10 13:04:02 EST 2012
Andrew Dul wrote:
> On 2/10/2012 3:11 AM, John Curran wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> I am not sure what the exact policy answer is to this scenario, but
> something seems like it needs to deal with this issue. Its possible
> this is a corner case which will never occur, but what exists today
> seems like it needs changes to reflect business and contract realities.
Perhaps you can share the reasoning you have that causes you to believe
that the courts would desire to enforce a contract between A and B on
party C's property.
Consider how you reasoning changes when either or both of parties A and
B's behavior with regards to C is governed by contract.
The contents of the ARIN database belong to ARIN, who administers the
database in accordance with its governance structure - which defines and
involves community led policy to control the database.
The concern we should all have is that this database not lose any of its
usefulness to us as a community.
More information about the ARIN-PPML