[arin-ppml] Nanog IPV4 Panel Discussion and 8.3 transfers

[Joe Maimon]

Andrew Dul wrote:
> On 2/10/2012 3:11 AM, John Curran wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

>
> I am not sure what the exact policy answer is to this scenario, but
> something seems like it needs to deal with this issue.  Its possible
> this is a corner case which will never occur, but what exists today
> seems like it needs changes to reflect business and contract realities.
>
> Andrew
>
>

Perhaps you can share the reasoning you have that causes you to believe 
that the courts would desire to enforce a contract between A and B on 
party C's property.

Consider how you reasoning changes when either or both of parties A and 
B's behavior with regards to C is governed by contract.

The contents of the ARIN database belong to ARIN, who administers the 
database in accordance with its governance structure - which defines and 
involves community led policy to control the database.

The concern we should all have is that this database not lose any of its 
usefulness to us as a community.


Best,

Joe