[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-163 Dedicated resources for initial ISP allocations

[Jeffrey Lyon]

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Support. Needs more discussion, but shouldn't be dropped.
>
> On Wednesday, February 1, 2012, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at chl.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Joe Maimon<jmaimon at chl.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, that would really depend on the fate of the three month window.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> They're not connected at all. I'm on the inside of the masher and I
>>> can tell you that the more text that you provide, the more that people
>>> will want to "help". Speaking as an AC member,  I'm happy to help you
>>> condense this and to help you reduce the opportunity to grind it into
>>> oblivion.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> -M<
>>>
>>
>> The time this proposal remains relevant depends very much on the three
>> month window staying in effect.
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent via a mobile device
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

I may be inclined to support, but really the free pool should be
further restricted. Companies with the financial resources should be
encouraged to use the transfer market. New applicants who are also
small businesses, non-profit, etc. should be given priority on the
free pool. This could go many ways, but I wanted to at least open it
up for discussion.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions