[arin-ppml] New Policy Proposal

Kevin Kargel kkargel at polartel.com
Fri Aug 17 11:05:15 EDT 2012


{SNIP}
> > I would write:
> >
> > "The ISP _MUST NOT_ have control of how the layer-3 network
> > infrastructure is subdivided, a regulated infrastructure
> > provider must be in control of that to qualify for the /29
> > exclusion."
> >
> > (lots of ISPs buy infrastructure from third parties that tell
> > them how it will be provisioned)
> >
> 
> I understand your concern, but, all providers are "regulated", so this
> would be a technical no-op.
> 
> How about:
> 
> "The ISP must not own or control the equipment and/or provisioning
> design of the layer-3 network infrastructure and must be obtaining
> that from a separate infrastructure provider in a manner similar to
> "unbundled elements"."
[kjk] 
[kjk] I pretty much agree with this but I have no idea how it would be
policed or enforced.  

> 
> Owen
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4935 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120817/b1bb2463/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list