[arin-ppml] New Policy Proposal
mcr at sandelman.ca
Thu Aug 16 18:33:19 EDT 2012
>>>>> "William" == William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> writes:
William> So, the cable companies found a loophole in the CRTC's
William> requirement that they could exploit to compel the
William> competitive ISPs to act in a manner inconsistent with ARIN
William> policy. Rock and a hard place, as someone else said, but
William> the rock is the cable company not the CRTC. And the CRTC
William> has a large hammer which they use to pound on the rocks
William> when they find it needful.
William> What's your guess as to what would happen if one of the
William> ISPs filed a complaint with the CRTC to the effect that a
William> cable company had made an unreasonable addressing demand?
William> What if the complaint was accompanied by written guidance
William> from ARIN to the effect that assigning IPv4 address pools
William> far in advance of actual users is inconsistent with current
William> international standards for IPv4 address management.
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
More information about the ARIN-PPML