[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-180 ISP Private Reassignment
hannigan at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 15:00:35 EDT 2012
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:54 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> First, I cannot support this proposal as written, however I would like to
> see more flexibility provided on this issue.
> So here is the problem, your one customer that wants their data private
> isn't that big of deal, the system won't fall apart if their data is
> private. However, if everyone wants their data private or ISPs start
> marking all their data private by default then the system may fall part.
> Or, at the very least we probably need a radically different system, I'm not
> fundamentally opposed to that either, but that's not what your proposing.
> As written, your proposal allows an ISP to mark all their data as private.
I too and not in favor of this in case that's not clear. My intention
in supporting this is to improve upon the proposal by clearly
differentiating the dis aggregates from the direct allocations and
providing a smaller, but potentially more accurate (and less expensive
e.g. cutting network operating cost), data set as a reference for
points of contact.
More information about the ARIN-PPML