[arin-ppml] New Policy Proposal
farmer at umn.edu
Thu Aug 16 14:38:44 EDT 2012
On 8/16/12 13:11 CDT, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Would it be feasible for the policy to mandate that:
> ISP must show that all blocks larger than /29 are at least 50% utilized
> or must reprovision under-utilized blocks to accommodate growth first?
> I think if we were to add this protection to the policy, it would be more than
> adequate to address the concerns expressed about "land grabs".
I like this idea, the only additional restriction I would include is
that to qualify for this;
The ISP _MUST NOT_ have control of how the network infrastructure is
subdivided, a third party infrastructure provider must be in control of
that to qualify for the /29 exclusion.
> Would it be feasible for the TPIA operators, or, does it present a problem that
> I am not understanding?
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
More information about the ARIN-PPML