[arin-ppml] New Policy Proposal
mcr at sandelman.ca
Thu Aug 16 14:25:02 EDT 2012
Guys, the TPIA's biggest problem is that it specifies a layer-3
solution, but does not mandate any support for IPv6.
IPv4 deployment would be easy via 4rd or some other v4-over-v6 solution
if the TPIA said something about IPv6.
As a Canadian, I would ask ARIN to tell the parties involved:
IPv4 is done. Go deploy IPv6.
the CRTC was told about the TPIA problem with IPv6 several
years ago, in an IPv6 task force they participated in.
William> 2. The competitive ISP is required by the _cable company_
William> to initially
Yes. Nice way to jam the market.
I'm aware of ISPs that do not serve all nodes.
William> What about the layer 2 tunnelling described in John's
William> links? Is the
William> cable company required to provide both methods, the layer 2
I'm unaware of any cable system that supports this method.
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
More information about the ARIN-PPML