[arin-ppml] IP Address Policy

[David Miller]

On 8/9/2012 4:44 PM, McTim wrote:
>
> Hello Steven,
>
> If you go through the thread, you will find that you are indeed the
> first to use the word cabal in this thread.

In truth, I believe that I was the first to use the word cabal.

Steven Ryerse wrote:
"...it is not reasonable for a monopoly to deny a resource request just
because
others in the community don't want me to have the resources."

David Miller wrote:
"There is no cabal controlling address allocations. There is no group of
people in the community that voted against or "don't want" you to have
resources."


>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Steven Ryerse
> <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com <mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>>
> wrote:
>
>     It's funny, there is no vinegar in my first post on this subject
>     but it sure generated some aimed at me! 
>
>
> your first few posts in this thread were all vinegar.  Read them
> again, you want a pony and 
> threaten to pitch a tantrum until ya get one (at least that's the way
> it reads to me).
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120809/cc02b7d8/attachment.htm>