[arin-ppml] IP Address Policy
dmiller at tiggee.com
Thu Aug 9 17:53:09 EDT 2012
On 8/9/2012 4:44 PM, McTim wrote:
> Hello Steven,
> If you go through the thread, you will find that you are indeed the
> first to use the word cabal in this thread.
In truth, I believe that I was the first to use the word cabal.
Steven Ryerse wrote:
"...it is not reasonable for a monopoly to deny a resource request just
others in the community don't want me to have the resources."
David Miller wrote:
"There is no cabal controlling address allocations. There is no group of
people in the community that voted against or "don't want" you to have
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Steven Ryerse
> <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com <mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>>
> It's funny, there is no vinegar in my first post on this subject
> but it sure generated some aimed at me!
> your first few posts in this thread were all vinegar. Read them
> again, you want a pony and
> threaten to pitch a tantrum until ya get one (at least that's the way
> it reads to me).
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML