[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-180 ISP Private Reassignment
sethm at rollernet.us
Thu Aug 9 11:53:01 EDT 2012
On 8/9/12 8:42 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Opposed. This goes too far.
> The current residential customer privacy provision is sufficient.
Agreed and opposed as well.
In the thread that preceded this it was said that the org in question
has a public facing department. I asked why not use that department's
already public contact info for whois as well, and I'd still like to
know why that isn't a possibility because it seems reasonable (and
policy complying) to me.
More information about the ARIN-PPML