[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

[Jo Rhett]

On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:44 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> Have you considered the double-standard in place here?
> 
> Where you specify a DHCP pool for always-on DSL users who may well
> hold a particular address for months, ARIN does not consider itself at
> liberty to inquire into the customers' identities and is able
> "validate" the use regardless. Yet if you explicitly assign them
> /32's...


I'm not aware of any double standard. I've had to supply customer lists using dynamic pools as well. It was neither harder nor easier than supplying lists of customers using /32s.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120430/3c2b4be3/attachment.htm>