[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement
jrhett at netconsonance.com
Mon Apr 30 17:52:20 EDT 2012
On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:44 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> Have you considered the double-standard in place here?
> Where you specify a DHCP pool for always-on DSL users who may well
> hold a particular address for months, ARIN does not consider itself at
> liberty to inquire into the customers' identities and is able
> "validate" the use regardless. Yet if you explicitly assign them
I'm not aware of any double standard. I've had to supply customer lists using dynamic pools as well. It was neither harder nor easier than supplying lists of customers using /32s.
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML